“Where do you bank your cash?”
Cover, J., FUHRMAN SPRING, A. M. Y.,
& GARSHICK KLEIT, R. A. C. H. E. L. (2011). Minorities on the Margins? The
Spatial Organization of Fringe Banking Services. Journal of Urban Affairs,
33(3), 317-344.
Some people may use a traditional bank
or a credit union. Others may visit an alternative financial service provider
(AFS) for banking services; AFS are pawnshops, payday lenders, check cashers,
and car title loans. Minorities are the main users of AFS, which brings
accusations that AFS are specifically targeting minorities.
In their study, Cover et al. (2011)
research if AFS are targeting minorities by using spatial modeling, bivariate
testing, and multivariate regression. Four case studies are used for the
analysis: Boise-Nampa, Idaho, Yakima, Washington, Rapid City, South Dakota, and
Waterloo-Cedar Falls, Iowa. The researchers choose small metropolitan areas
because they have fewer banking options. Furthermore, the areas where specifically
chosen because of their demographic makeup; Boise is a medium-size metro area
and is about 11% Hispanic; Yakima is 41% Hispanic, Rapid City is 9% Native
American; Waterloo is 6% African-American.
After choosing the metro areas, Cover
et al. (2011) used GIS spatial modeling to map out the racial composition,
neighborhood income, and commercial activity for each city. Data was obtained
from the U.S. Census Bureau, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Credit
Union National Association, and Reference USA.
GIS mapping reveals that AFS are highly
concentrated in Hispanic and Native American neighborhoods in Boise, Yakima,
and Rapid City; however, black neighborhoods in Waterloo contained less AFS
than the other metro areas in this study. As for poverty and AFS, spatial
modeling indicates no clear pattern of poverty and AFS concentration for Boise
and Rapid City: banks and AFS are more evenly distributed. In Yakima and Rapid
City, AFS and poverty are in the same areas. In neighborhoods with AFS, poverty
tends to be higher. It seems as if AFS are targeting poor neighborhoods and
minorities, but this not the whole story.
Using multivariate analysis, Cover et
al. (2011) were able to hold individual neighborhood characteristics fixed and
determine which variable has the greatest effect on AFS location. The only
problem with using multivariate regression for this project is that the sample
size is too small, which restricts the number of variables to be used in the
model. A poisson regression of count of AFS providers was used to determine
which variable influences AFS location the most; independent variables include
number of banks/credit unions, number of businesses, population, percent urban,
percent of people who are 200% below the poverty line, and minority
concentration. The results indicate that commercial activity, concentration of
Hispanics, and neighborhoods with moderate poverty are statistical significant
from zero and all three variables have a large effect on AFS location.
Cover et al. (2011) offer some
explanations on their findings. First, AFS and banks tend to locate in areas
that zoned for commercial activity; hence the reason why business activity
influences where an AFS locates because that is where customers go to shop and
spend money. As for Hispanic neighborhoods, AFS locate in those areas because
Hispanics lack access to traditional banking services. Boise and Yakima are
agricultural communities, and the Hispanics working in those cities may be
undocumented workers. Therefore, undocumented workers do not have the
prerequisites to open a bank account, such as identification or minimum account
balances. When it comes to poverty, AFS locate in neighborhoods with moderate
poverty because those areas have the need for such services. Areas with high
poverty are not attractive to AFS since those individuals lack the income to
obtain and repay such services.
This study can be used to provide
traditional banking services to low-moderate-income households. More research
should be done on larger metropolitan areas since this would increase the sample
size. It may be that the market fails to provide traditional banking services
to certain segments of the population.
This is an interesting socioeconomic study. Makes you wonder if banks look this deeply into areas when building new branches or if they base it strictly off of areas with a lot of commercial activity. I would think the latter.
ReplyDelete