This study began with the impetus from a research project
that included a survey of three farmers markets in the greater Austin area.
When one is comparing the prices of various food products purchased from
markets, vendors, and grocers, often the information gained can overgeneralize
and have little relevance to specific locales. Information from a local price
comparison study, on the other hand, would aid related businesses and allow
them to more effectively engage their customer base.
As the researchers began interacting with market operators
and vendors, they found that many individuals identified the lapses in existing
price comparison studies and how beneficial a comprehensive local price
comparison could be. The survey information from this study comes from 3
farmers market locations: downtown Austin, Cedar Park, and Georgetown. The
research features three complementary components: price comparisons, surveys,
and participant observation. The researchers employed convenience sampling
methods and refrained from asking any ethically complex questions.
The survey data revealed a general trend of visitors
acknowledging that the products were more expensive at the farmers market but
justified for various reasons. In addition, in a segment where they were asked
to list as many qualities they look for in their food purchases, the responses
revealed a strong priority for items being “local” and “organic” (each of those
being chosen by more than 50% of the respondents).
From this price comparison study, we can see that farmer’s
markets products were more expensive overall for these sites. However, there
were many instances where the farmers’ market prices were lower than similar
products at natural grocers and conventional supermarkets. The researchers
identified the difficulty in finding qualitatively similar items at each food
provider with product origin being the largest contribution to difference as
shown in Figure 2.
This research has built upon the successes and inadequacies
of former price comparison studies, and the model and methodology will
hopefully enable future research opportunities. Finally, the researchers
identified seasonality and convenience as factors which need to be addressed
more deliberately as their model is improved over time.
Figure 1. Map of Local Definitions by Venue Type
Figure 2. Maps of Item Product Origins by Venue
Long, J., Sounny-Slitine, M. A., Castles, K., Curran, J., Glaser, H.,
Hoyer, E., Moore, W., Morse, L., O’Hara, M., & Parafina, B. (2013). Toward
an applied methodology for price comparison studies of farmers’ markets and
competing retailers at the local scale. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development.
Advance online
publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2013.033.010
No comments:
Post a Comment