Researchers that use this type of niche modeling to guide their studies can achieve enhanced sampling and monitoring strategies of species with the ability to better understand how different species may respond to both anthropogenic and natural environmental change. An additional important implication of these modeling tools is the enhanced capacity to identify smaller zones within a region that are of particular importance for the conservation of threatened species. These significant areas (regarded as critical habitat zones when dealing with threatened species) can be prioritized once they are identified to ultimately increase the effectiveness of preservation efforts and ensure funding is used in the most precise manner to sustain these habitats and the species they foster.
This niche model from the paper provides an example of how environmental data can be used to predict the distribution of a species of interest (California Gnatcatchers in this case) throughout suitable habitats in a region of Southern California.
FIG. 1. Full-rank ecological niche model [D2 (y; 1)] for California Gnatcatchers based on 21 environmental variables. Habitat similarity to known, occupied locations increases as the color darkens.
Very interesting! I am curious about the possible differences between rural and urban niches. Once these habitats are identified, how do we address the threatened species in different areas? I also wonder if there is something specific about that area of Southern California. I find this study intriguing, as it seems like it could definitely help conservationist efforts.
ReplyDelete