Remote Sensing and GIS isn’t just for analyzing terrestrial environments. A study by Vahtmae and Kutser (2013) use geospatial
data and regression models to gain an understanding of the health of the Baltic
sea. The authors point out that, as one
of the most polluted, the Baltic Sea’s ecological conditions need to be
protected. Due to the lack of
information, insufficient data, and scientific resources, environmental planning has been
limited and not very effective (Vahtmae, Kutser, 2013).
The health of a marine environment can often be evaluated by
measuring benthic macrophyte habitats. The authors indicate a reduction of the
abundance of certain macroalgae, an indicator species in the Baltic Sea. By using large-scale analysis of marine
habitats, they will be able to gain a broader understanding of marine habitats
and provide evidence with which to gain environmental change.
Since the Baltic Sea is a shallow marine environment with
several terrestrial imputs, particulate matter, dissolved organic matter and
phytoplankton blooms stay suspended large areas of the sea. Image-based supervised classification
techniques such as Maximum Likelihood, spectral Angle Mapper, can make it very
difficult for certain types of remote sensing, not to mention time consuming
and costly.
This article describes several alternative approaches. One such approach uses a modeled spectral
library, in which remote sensing reflectances are compared to simulated
reflectances. Though the known properties of the substrates and the optical
properties of the water are necessary for this form of image classification and
may negatively affect the accuracy. The
third approach, is a basic classification method such as Spectral Angle Mapper,
or SAM which has no sensitivity to illumination or albedo effects. With this method, one can change the accuracy
and compare data with spectral library in the same instance.
The study tested both image-based approach and spectral
library approach. Though the image-based
method performed better than the spectral library method, they had to take into
account that the turbidity of the water could change the results. In evaluation of the data, the suitability of
the two methods for shallow water habitat mapping show basically no difference
between airborne hyperspectral and satellite multispectral data (Vahtmae, Kutser, 2013).
Vahtmäe, Ele, and Tiit
Kutser. "Classifying the Baltic Sea shallow water habitats using
image-based and spectral library methods." Remote Sensing 5, no. 5
(2013): 2451-2474.
No comments:
Post a Comment