One environmental impact that has raised serious concerns is loss of Amazonian
forest through indirect land use change (ILUC), whereby mechanized agriculture encroaches on
existing pastures, displacing them to the frontier. This phenomenon has been hypothesized by
many researchers and projected on the basis of simulation for the Amazonian forests of Brazil.
It has not yet been measured statistically, owing to conceptual difficulties in linking distal land
cover drivers to the point of impact.
Global demands for food and biofuel are expected to soar in
coming decades . To meet these demands, new land will need
to be brought into production. Brazil, with its abundant land
resource, will no doubt continue to play an important role as a
global supplier of agricultural commodities . Although conversions of forest
to mechanized agriculture have been observed, pasture expansion remains by far
the primary direct cause of Amazonian deforestation. Recent
research suggests, however, that mechanized agriculture may
exert a significant indirect effect, by the displacement of old
pastures, and their recovery on the forest frontier. The present letter takes this
displacement mechanism as ILUC, for the purposes of its
analysis.
In general, statistical explanations of land cover change have
defined explanatory and dependent variables for a single
location, possible with a set of nearby neighborhoods, a
method that does not capture the effect of potentially distant
influences. The approach in
this letter overcomes the problem of distal spatial effects
by using GIS to associate locations in the forest frontier
where deforestation is occurring with ‘distant’ neighbors in the
settled agricultural parts of Amazonia. The statistical models
implemented possess a sufficiently general form that they can
be implemented wherever ILUC is of interest to policy makers.
The statistical models indicate that deforestation in the
forest frontiers of the basin is strongly related to soy expansion
in its settled agricultural areas, to the south and east.
Source: Arima, E. Y., Richards, P., Walker, R., & Caldas, M. M. (2011). Statistical confirmation of indirect land use change in the Brazilian Amazon.Environmental Research Letters, 6(2), 024010.
Why is it that soy expansion is focused on just one area, while cattle seems to be expanding throughout?
ReplyDeletethis was interesting since it coincides with my forest roads map I did my blog post which showed how the people who deforest reach these areas.
ReplyDeleteGood point that you make that while the Amazon is in Brazil, the need for resources that people have to have can be found here. So therefore land change can affect not only the Amazon but people all over the world are affected as well.
ReplyDelete