Sunday, September 30, 2012

The Fragmentation of Space in the Amazon Basin: Emergent Road Networks


Arima, Eugenio Y., Walker, Robert T., Sales, Marcio, Souza Jr., Carlos, and Perz, Stephen G. (2008). “The Fragmentation of Space in the Amazon Basin: Emergent Road Networks”. 699-709.

            
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2459/3577304207_39342e49de.jpg
            
            Home to the world’s largest contiguous tropical forest, the Brazilian Amazon in its vastness has been losing coverage and its magnificent realm to loggers and those traveling the roads that traverse the natural forested expanse. Tropical deforestation has been an ongoing problem, negatively affecting biodiversity and the carbon cycle. Studying the emergence of deforestation and its patterns, specifically in relation to the consequences of the road networks that have branched off to further decimate the Amazon, the authors research the socio-spatial processes in effect.
            Through the replication of road networks, such as the dendritic (a common pattern of road fragmentation), GIS is used to map out the area and provide a greater understanding of the human forces that cause the habitat fragmentation and its continual proliferation. Decision-making in context with forested habitat and forested frontiers presents a number of challenges, one of which is key: resource exploitation and the subsequent degradation of non-human animal habitat.
            Roads built by loggers present a much greater problem to the environmental integrity of the Amazon rainforest than do those put in by the federal government. This is primarily due to the sheer number of them that bifurcate into various others, no matter the size of the roads themselves. Furthermore, they split off from the extensive road system already in place, further adding to the destruction, or often times, the eventual removal of species’ home- both arboreal and terrestrial. Additionally, the attraction of timber and the ease of access attracts more people, tracking in more potential for habitat degradation and loss from the influx of a one-sided, economically-eager human population.
            
            
             As mentioned earlier, the forest pattern studied here is classified as dendritic, a pattern that signifies a specific pattern other than patchy or independent settlement fragmentation, associated strictly with spatiality. Because of its spatial figure, GIS proves to be a key factor in the examination of the data, stressing the foremost form of forest loss due to massive logging practices and transportation of such.  
            Dijkstra’s algorithm via GIS tools generates networks and provides the most viable one, the best possible path after combining each path into a patchwork of data. Linkage of cells and a direction-to-origin-grid is implemented to eliminate the unnecessary routes collected. From Dijkstra’s algorithm sprang Tomlin’s heuristic hydrology approach. With this approach, Tomlin used the flow of water and its destination to estimate a similar path and thereby pinpoint the path of least resistance (and hence greater travel) to loggers and the like. Altogether, raster modeling was utilized to gather a substantial representation of non-equidistant tress across the Amazonian landscape. In addition, geostatistics and surveys helped to pinpoint the areas with the highest volume of timber (which, in turn, were also the areas that required the most roads to access the timber). The project conducted included forest inventories of over 2,000 Amazonian sites with measurement of trees over 23 centimeters, and the volume of trees per hectare was also accounted for. This project, based on kriging interpolation aided the researchers in defining the roads leading to logging sites- categorizing them as determinate and indeterminate roads. Below is a GIS map to this effect.
(Retrieved from original article)
            Defining the roads from raster modeling enabled the researchers to calculate the cost of the transverse of each cell and corresponding route/road. Slopes, rivers, and soil susceptible to flooding appear to be the most critical cost variables according to careful observation and surveys taken from loggers in the region. Other factors influencing cost, of which the majority of this article is focused, constitutes building/infrastructure costs as well as transportation costs. These costs demonstrate some of the ways loggers territorialize the landscape before logging is even considered.
            Overall the modeling suggests that loggers make rash judgments and insufficient spatial decisions while lacking sufficient information about the Amazonian landscape they manipulate. With the most forest clearance happening within the last decade (referenced in the article), loggers and all other players for that matter must acknowledge not only the personal costs they are managing, but also the residual environmental costs. Loggers’ imprint on the Amazon Rainforest currently is nothing more than an ominous reminder of the incessant human need for conquering, claiming, and convenience of nature. Rather than this dreadful impression, loggers and humans globally should leave behind stepping stones of the natural world, trademarks of the wonders of the rainforest for successive generations to marvel at in the same way we do today.  



For further reading, check out the article below:

6 comments:

  1. The most typical form of road development, which is awesome to see in Google Earth, is called the "FishBone", where there is a main road that is the spine, with little road jetting out perpendicularly. Check out this pic: https://www.e-education.psu.edu/drupal6/files/geog030/biodiversity/fish_bone_deforest.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is a very interesting article that shows that lack of planning can have unattended consequences, many of the road networks made are unregulated. One tool that can be used is designating parts of the forest for conservations. Designating a part of the forest as a conservation zone, if chosen in the right place, can cutoff whole sections of forest, making a difference even in parts not designated for conservation. One thing to realize is that the forest is useful for people and supplies lots of services to local people. Many conservation plans take these services away for the local people. The main problem is wood extraction for global market. So cutting off sections of the forest with smart planning of conservation zones can protect even non conserved zones from global forces allowing for local use to continue.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This sort of research is urgent. Once you make an area accessible it seems like it becomes a domino effect of creating lots of little roads which fragment areas of forest, deteriorating the ecological community. If planning for roads avoided this sort of fragmentation, it would really help limit the impact. What people don't realize is fragmenting land creates all sorts of "edge effects", which degrades the habitat both along and within the patches of forest. So just by looking at a picture of the roads, unless you are aware of these side-effects of fragmentation you won't get a true sense of the impact. So maybe another map to help planners could use buffers (output type: dissolve all!) to show the edge effects and how they extend within the fragments.

    ReplyDelete
  4. These roads are displacing a lot of animals and killing them. These animal have never seen a vehicle before so they now have no idea how to cross these roads and are getting killed. Also Like Professor Anwar said these huge companies are taking away resources from the local people who rely on them heavily, but once the resources are gone we will then have bigger problems to worry about. In an article i read a while back it said that the rain forests are only 4% of the Earth's surface but accounts for more than half of the Earth's Oxygen. If these roads do not get planned out carefully (or stop being created) they will eventually mess up the entire rain forest ecosystem and then what will we do for oxygen? GIS please help these people plan accordingly!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is where the debate on environmentalism often breaks down. It is easy for people in the developed world to say protect the rainforest, but for many living in developing countries, this is a resource that can be used to help grow the economy. The problem is trying to implement sustainable development. President Lula of Brazil stated it nicely in the 2009 UNFCC Meeting in Copenhagen. He said while Brazil is working to responsible develop its resources, he has to balance this with other social demands. He said his campaign promise when running for president was not 'a car in every driveway' like during Hoover vs FDR, it was "3 meals a day for everyone", or to end hunger. It puts some perspective, of course any country wants to develop its natural resources, but the question is how. Unregulated development or sustainable development?

      Delete
    2. Another point about GIS, while it is a great planning tool, it can also be used for resource extraction. Many times maps can have consequence that the author did not expect. For example if a study maps out where all the timber is in the rainforest to help in conservation efforts, this same map can be used in order to find where to extract resources. Remember GIS is a tool, the user is more important in how it is used.

      Delete